<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Round Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://roundblog.net/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://roundblog.net</link>
	<description>Yeah, that is the ESPN font</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 22:35:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Things that piss me off… a lot. Part I by jeb</title>
		<link>http://roundblog.net/2009/08/admin/28/comment-page-1#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>jeb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 22:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roundblog.net/?p=28#comment-63</guid>
		<description>I wish I had the time, energy, and intelligence to start a real MLIA site the way it used to be. I wouldn&#039;t let it get taken over by liars and the such.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish I had the time, energy, and intelligence to start a real MLIA site the way it used to be. I wouldn’t let it get taken over by liars and the such.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Things that piss me off… a lot. Part I by your party crasher</title>
		<link>http://roundblog.net/2009/08/admin/28/comment-page-1#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>your party crasher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 17:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roundblog.net/?p=28#comment-62</guid>
		<description>MLIA is just fine the way it is chill </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MLIA is just fine the way it is chill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Things that piss me off… a lot. Part I by mlialover</title>
		<link>http://roundblog.net/2009/08/admin/28/comment-page-1#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>mlialover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 23:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roundblog.net/?p=28#comment-61</guid>
		<description>mlia is a great website and it only ruins it that people who have nothing better to do but make things up!  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mlia is a great website and it only ruins it that people who have nothing better to do but make things up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Things that piss me off… a lot. Part I by Carlos Santiago</title>
		<link>http://roundblog.net/2009/08/admin/28/comment-page-1#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos Santiago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 23:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roundblog.net/?p=28#comment-60</guid>
		<description>You are seriously right. But there was this one person who lied and got everyone interested into only &quot;FUNNY&quot; and not &quot;AVERAGE&quot;. The site should be renamed &quot;MY LIFE IS A LIE&quot;. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are seriously right. But there was this one person who lied and got everyone interested into only “FUNNY” and not “AVERAGE”. The site should be renamed “MY LIFE IS A LIE”.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Things that piss me off… a lot. Part I by Cindy Lan</title>
		<link>http://roundblog.net/2009/08/admin/28/comment-page-1#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>Cindy Lan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 23:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roundblog.net/?p=28#comment-59</guid>
		<description>Good post. I like MLIA but it makes me mad when you read these things that you know arent real. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post. I like MLIA but it makes me mad when you read these things that you know arent real.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on MLIA — Not so Average Anymore by Me</title>
		<link>http://roundblog.net/2009/10/admin/37/comment-page-1#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>Me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 21:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roundblog.net/?p=37#comment-58</guid>
		<description>I agree-- MLIA was funny when it was actually average.

The new stories can be funny too (although many of them aren&#039;t), but they&#039;re not like the old ones. The old stories weren&#039;t as obviously funny as the new ones, so I think a lot of people miss out on what makes them funny. 
Oh well-- that&#039;s their loss.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree– MLIA was funny when it was actually average.</p>
<p>The new stories can be funny too (although many of them aren’t), but they’re not like the old ones. The old stories weren’t as obviously funny as the new ones, so I think a lot of people miss out on what makes them funny.<br />
Oh well– that’s their loss.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My Video Production Wish List by Patrick</title>
		<link>http://roundblog.net/2010/03/admin/113/comment-page-1#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 02:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roundblog.net/?p=113#comment-57</guid>
		<description>Oh, and just a heads up, the &quot;Reply&quot; button for your site doesn&#039;t work for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and just a heads up, the “Reply” button for your site doesn’t work for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My Video Production Wish List by Patrick</title>
		<link>http://roundblog.net/2010/03/admin/113/comment-page-1#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 02:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roundblog.net/?p=113#comment-56</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-55&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;Owen Kuemerle:&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
 So when you use a&#160;boom mic, its pur­pose is to pick up on the actors talk­ing and the sounds of their phys­i­cal actions. This will ulti­mately lead to reduc­tion in ambient/​background noise because shot­gun mics are highly direc­tional. Mount­ing the mic on the cam­era will give you a&#160;wider area where sound can be picked up and as a&#160;result, it will also give you ambient/​background noise. The down­side to this is the talk­ing qual­ity will be lower and the phys­i­cal sounds that the actors make will be less pro­nounced unless you have the cam­era fairly close to the shot. You will want to record a&#160;minute or so of background/​ambient noise to mix in with shots that used a&#160;boom mic because oth­er­wise it will sound awk­ward with that lack of back­ground noise.
Another thing to con­sider is that it will require a&#160;ded­i­cated sound per­son and you have to make sure that mic doesn’t get in your&#160;shots.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Thanks for the insight. I&#039;m going to definitely try one out for my next movie, which should be coming out in April so I&#039;ll tell you how it goes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
<a href="#comment-55" rel="nofollow"><br />
<strong><em>Owen Kuemerle:</em></strong><br />
</a><br />
 So when you use a boom mic, its pur­pose is to pick up on the actors talk­ing and the sounds of their phys­i­cal actions. This will ulti­mately lead to reduc­tion in ambient/​background noise because shot­gun mics are highly direc­tional. Mount­ing the mic on the cam­era will give you a wider area where sound can be picked up and as a result, it will also give you ambient/​background noise. The down­side to this is the talk­ing qual­ity will be lower and the phys­i­cal sounds that the actors make will be less pro­nounced unless you have the cam­era fairly close to the shot. You will want to record a minute or so of background/​ambient noise to mix in with shots that used a boom mic because oth­er­wise it will sound awk­ward with that lack of back­ground noise.<br />
Another thing to con­sider is that it will require a ded­i­cated sound per­son and you have to make sure that mic doesn’t get in your shots.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Thanks for the insight. I’m going to definitely try one out for my next movie, which should be coming out in April so I’ll tell you how it goes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My Video Production Wish List by Owen Kuemerle</title>
		<link>http://roundblog.net/2010/03/admin/113/comment-page-1#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>Owen Kuemerle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 05:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roundblog.net/?p=113#comment-55</guid>
		<description>So when you use a boom mic, its purpose is to pick up on the actors talking and the sounds of their physical actions. This will ultimately lead to reduction in ambient/background noise because shotgun mics are highly directional. Mounting the mic on the camera will give you a wider area where sound can be picked up and as a result, it will also give you ambient/background noise. The downside to this is the talking quality will be lower and the physical sounds that the actors make will be less pronounced unless you have the camera fairly close to the shot. You will want to record a minute or so of background/ambient noise to mix in with shots that used a boom mic because otherwise it will sound awkward with that lack of background noise.

Another thing to consider is that it will require a dedicated sound person and you have to make sure that mic doesn&#039;t get in your shots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So when you use a boom mic, its purpose is to pick up on the actors talking and the sounds of their physical actions. This will ultimately lead to reduction in ambient/background noise because shotgun mics are highly directional. Mounting the mic on the camera will give you a wider area where sound can be picked up and as a result, it will also give you ambient/background noise. The downside to this is the talking quality will be lower and the physical sounds that the actors make will be less pronounced unless you have the camera fairly close to the shot. You will want to record a minute or so of background/ambient noise to mix in with shots that used a boom mic because otherwise it will sound awkward with that lack of background noise.</p>
<p>Another thing to consider is that it will require a dedicated sound person and you have to make sure that mic doesn’t get in your shots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My Video Production Wish List by Patrick</title>
		<link>http://roundblog.net/2010/03/admin/113/comment-page-1#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 04:50:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roundblog.net/?p=113#comment-54</guid>
		<description>Owen, I&#039;m impressed that you&#039;ve made another blog post. I  wish that you&#039;d update the site more often because you actually write some pretty good stuff and I enjoy reading your posts. 

Since I&#039;ve been looking into boom mikes for my films, in your opinion, how much of an advantage does a boom mike offer in comparison to a standard mounted shotgun mike?

The reason for why I ask is because I can see a boom mike making my shooting sessions a whole lot more complicated, but if the audio quality advantages are worthwhile, I wouldn&#039;t mind using them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Owen, I’m impressed that you’ve made another blog post. I  wish that you’d update the site more often because you actually write some pretty good stuff and I enjoy reading your posts. </p>
<p>Since I’ve been looking into boom mikes for my films, in your opinion, how much of an advantage does a boom mike offer in comparison to a standard mounted shotgun mike?</p>
<p>The reason for why I ask is because I can see a boom mike making my shooting sessions a whole lot more complicated, but if the audio quality advantages are worthwhile, I wouldn’t mind using them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
